ETHICON HAR1120 HARMONIC™ 1100 Shears,20cm
ETHICON HAR1120 HARMONIC™ 1100 Shears,20cm
Phone:+86-21-54286005
Microsystem
Endoscopysystem
Energysystem
EndoscopyConsumables
ETHICON HAR1120 HARMONIC™ 1100 Shears,20cm
Phone:+86-21-54286005
Curved, tapered tip that enables more precise dissection than HARMONIC ACE™ +7 Shears.5 Its unique shape mimics a mechanical dissector and may reduce the need to use a separate dedicated dissecting instrument.9
Reduce heat exposure on tissue with transection speeds 35% faster when using the Energy button10 and 40% faster when transecting vessels 5-7mm in diameter using Advanced Hemostasis mode.11
Achieve greater control with lower maximum blade temperature.4 HARMONIC 1100 Shears has an improved Adaptive Tissue Technology algorithm that actively controls blade heat which may protect surrounding tissue and vital structures.12
1. Per internal market share data and preclinical testing of thermal impact. (120150‐220809)
2. HARMONIC 1100 Shears Information for Use. Ethicon, Inc.
3. Compared to Harmonic ACE+7 Shears. (140048-200512)
4. Based on benchtop study that showed Harmonic 1100 had significantly lower maximum blade temperature than Harmonic ACE+7 Shears after 15 tip bite transections. (140050-200512).
5. Based on a PreClinical evaluation compared to HARMONIC ACE+7. (138469‐200427).
6. In a meta‐analysis comparing HARMONIC® devices to conventional techniques; 171.1 min for HARMONIC® vs. 198.7 min for conventional (p=0.0002)
Gastrectomy and D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta‐Analysis Comparing the Harmonic Scalpel to Conventional Techniques. Cheng, H et al. Volume 2015, Article ID 397260, 11 pages. (034750‐200108).
7. In a meta‐analysis comparing HARMONIC® devices to conventional techniques (p<0.00001) Gastrectomy and D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta‐Analysis Comparing the Harmonic Scalpel to Conventional Techniques. Cheng, H et al. Volume 2015, Article ID 397260, 11 pages. (034751‐210816).
8. Budget Impact Model analysis comparing portfolio‐wide adoption of Ethicon energy devices versus other non‐Ethicon manufactured energy devices in a typical hospital performing 8,000 annual electrosurgery procedures across five specialties (bariatric, colorectal, thoracic, gynecology, and general surgery). Ferko, N., et al. A Device Category Economic Model of Electrosurgery Technologies Across Procedure Types: A U.S. Hospital Budget Impact Analysis. J of Med Eco. Jan‐Dec 2021;24(1):524‐535. (185706‐220323).
9. Based on user validation study where 14/19 surgeons that use competitive advanced energy devices rated Harmonic 1100 Shear as superior in dissection capability. (057596‐220317).
10. In a benchtop study, versus HARMONIC ACE+7, with porcine vessels 3-5 mm in diameter (p<0.001). (050521-200421).
11. In a bench top study comparing sealing times of HARMONIC ACE+7 and HARMONIC HD 1000i, HARMONIC HD 1000i Shears transected vessels faster than HARMONIC ACE+7 (mean vessel transection time of 9.186 seconds vs 15.291 seconds). The algorithm for Advanced Hemostasis on HARMONIC HD 1000i and 1100 Shears are the same. (051753‐220330).
12. Compared to previous generations of Harmonic devices. (140049‐210108).
Featured Product |
|
HARMONIC™ 1100 Shears |
|
---|---|
Codes |
HAR1120 |
Generator Required |
GEN11 2018-1 Software |
Handpieces Required |
None - Integrated Handpiece |
Description |
Ultrasonic shears, curved tip |
Shaft Diameter |
5mm |
Shaft Length |
|
Jaw/Tip Configuration |
Curved |
Jaw Aperture* |
15.32mm |
Jaw Length* |
18.87mm |
Cut Length* |
18.87mm |
Jaw Width* |
2.78mm |
Handle Type |
Gun design |
Degrees of Articulation |
360º |
Vessel Indication |
≤ 7mm |
Device Technology |
Ultrasonic energy, Adaptive Tissue Technology, Advanced Hemostasis |
Surgical Approach |
Open |
Qty./Box |
6 |