COVIDIEN SIGTRSB45AMT/45AXT/60AMT/60AXT Tri-Staple™ 2.0 Reinforced Reload
COVIDIEN SIGTRSB45AMT SIGTRSB45AXT SIGTRSB60AMT SIGTRSB60AXT Tri-Staple™ 2.0 Reinforced Reload
Phone:+86-21-54286005
Microsystem
Endoscopysystem
Energysystem
COVIDIEN SIGTRSB45AMT SIGTRSB45AXT SIGTRSB60AMT SIGTRSB60AXT Tri-Staple™ 2.0 Reinforced Reload
Phone:+86-21-54286005
Tri-Staple™ reinforced reloads are the only endoscopic staplers with preloaded tissue reinforcement for improved ease of use and less waste in the OR.1,†,‡ That convenience comes with the confidence of Tri-Staple™ technology and stronger reinforcement than Seamguard™*.2,§,Ω Plus, it may:
The Tri-Staple™ 2.0 reinforced reload is compatible with all Medtronic handles. When paired with the smart Signia™ stapler, it delivers:
†Compared to an aftermarket buttress.
‡Results based on n of 125 OR nurses and 125 surgeons by ORC International. Nov. 9, 2011.
§In-vitro tensile strength compared to Seamguard™* at days 7 and 14.
ΩBench test results may not necessarily be indicative of clinical performance.
††Compared to nonbuttressed reloads with Tri-Staple™ technology.
‡‡Operative time: P = 0.006. Bleeding: P = 0.001.
§§Compared to nonbuttressed reloads. P = 0.006.
ΩΩPreclinical results may not correlate with clinical performance in humans.
†††Compared to manual and fixed speed powered staplers.
1. Based on internally-sponsored study conducted by ORC International, Survey of tissue reinforcement users to determine waste and time loss attributed to separately loaded buttress materials in the OR. Online U.S. national sample of 125 surgeons and 125 OR nurses. Nov. 9, 2011.
2. Based on internal report #RE00240873, Mass, thickness, area measurements, pH measurements, and glycolic acid released for polyglycolic acid buttress (PGA) and Seamguard™* buttresses. [Reinforcement buttress material tested using 2-sample t-tests. Data calculated with 95% confidence using Minitab™ * (p < 0.0001)]. Dec. 02, 2019.
3. Based on analysis of internal Cognos monitoring from 2014 through April 2020. May 2, 2020.
4. El Moussaoui I, Limbga A, Mehdi A. Staple line reinforcement during sleeve gastrectomy with a new type of reinforced stapler. Minerva Chir. 2018;73(2):127–132.
5. Deguchi H, Tomoyasu M, Shigeeda W, Kaneko Y, Kanno H, Saito H. Reduction of air leakage using linear staple device with bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid felt for pulmonary lobectomy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68(3):266–272.
6. Based on internal report #RE00218740, Signia™ stapling adaptive firing technology data calculations and references. Aug. 7, 2019.
7. Based on internal test report #RE00147607, 4.5 mm round staple pull-apart analysis report. 2018.
8. Based on internal test report #R2146-173-0, ASA verification testing with slow speed force limit evaluation. 2015.
9. Based on internal test report #R2146-151-0, Powered stapling firing speed DOE analysis and ASA parameters. 2015.
ORDER CODE | DESCRIPTION | COLOR | STAPLE SIZE (INNER TO OUTER ROW) | UNIT OF MEASURE | QUANTITY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIGTRSB45AMT | Tri-Staple™ 2.0 Reinforced Reload 45 mm Medium/Thick |
Purple | 3.0 mm, 3.5 mm, 4.0 mm | Box | 6 |
SIGTRSB60AMT | Tri-Staple™ 2.0 Reinforced Reload 60 mm Medium/Thick |
Purple | 3.0 mm, 3.5 mm, 4.0 mm | Box | 6 |
SIGTRSB45AXT | Tri-Staple™ 2.0 Reinforced Reload 45 mm Extra Thick |
Black | 4.0 mm, 4.5 mm, 5.0 mm | Box | 6 |
SIGTRSB60AXT | Tri-Staple™ 2.0 Reinforced Reload 60 mm Extra Thick |
Black | 4.0 mm, 4.5 mm, 5.0 mm | Box | 6 |